Legal Opinion

Loucks v. Davies

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1908No. 5576; No. 3254 C. APublished

Appeal from the District Court of Larimer County. Hon. James E. Garrigues, Judge. Action by Ebenezer R. Davies against Harford Loucks. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Maxwell

The complaint in this action is in two counts. The first is based upon an alleged sale of real estate made by plaintiff (appellee here) to defendant (appellant), for which it is averred defendant agreed to pay plaintiff the sum of $450;' that defendant paid on account thereof $194, and that there is now due plaintiff from defendant, $256, with interest from October 1, 1901, at 8 per cent, per annum.

The second count of the complaint is eliminated from this appeal, as judgment on this' count was in-favor of appellant, and there is no cross-appeal.

*492The answer denied the allegations of the first…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mills v. HartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  2. Kannaugh v. Quartette Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  3. Johnson v. CummingsColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Woodward v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  5. Blyth v. PeopleColorado Court of Appeals · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API