Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 5, 2009No. 3D07-2674PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCope, J.

This is an appeal of an order denying a motion for postconviction DNA testing under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853. We agree with the State that the motion filed by defendant-appellant Leonard Taylor does not adequately explain “how the DNA testing requested by the motion will exonerate the movant of the crime for which the movant was sentenced, or a statement how the DNA testing will mitigate the sentence received by the mov-ant for that crime[.]” Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.853(b)(3). See Helton v. State, 947 So.2d 495, 497-98 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Peterson v. State, 919 So.2d 573, 574 (Fla.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hitchcock v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. Lott v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  3. Saffold v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  4. Helton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  5. Peterson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  2. Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API