Legal Opinion

United States v. Levino Michelena-Orovio

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 25, 1983No. 81-3706PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant, a member of the crew of a vessel intercepted on the high seas by the Coast Guard and found to have a cargo of marijuana, challenges his conviction of conspiracy to import marijuana and conspiracy to possess marijuana with intent to distribute it. He claims: (1) that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence; (2) that the court erred in refusing to allow the jury to smell the sample bale of marijuana; and (3) that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

I. FACTUAL…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Direct Sales Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. United States v. FalconeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United States v. Harry Greenspan, AKA Alfred A. Lugo, AKA Alfred Anthony Lugo, AKA Alex Lugo, AKA Alex StoneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. BeltranCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Levino Michelena-OrovioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. ElkinsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Gabriel BeyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API