Legal Opinion

People v. Ortiz

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 2016No. Court of Appeals No. 13CA1922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JUDGE J. JONES

¶ 1 Defendant, James Augustine Ortiz, appeals that portion of the district court’s sentencing order requiring him to pay $1,415.85 in restitution, representing the cost to repair a state patrol car damaged in the course of a state trooper’s attempt to apprehend him. Relying principally on Dubois v. People, 211 P.3d 41 (Colo.2009), defendant contends that because he did not plead guilty to an offense that specifically identifies the state patrol as a victim, the state patrol is not a victim in this case within the meaning of the restitution statutes. We conclude,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. GarnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. Dubois v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  3. People v. PaganColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Gallegos v. Colorado Ground Water CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  5. People v. BorquezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. FoosColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. People v. JaebColorado Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API