Legal Opinion
Satterthwaite v. Loomis & McLachlen
Texas Supreme Court
Decided May 12, 1891No. 7123PublishedCited by 16 opinions
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
MARR, Judge, Section A.
“Appellant on the 5th day of September, 1888, filed his first original petition against A. M. Loomis and W. B. McLachlen, who compose the firm of Loomis & McLachlen, defendants (appellees). In said petition the plaintiff substantially alleged, that on the 6th day of September, 1887, the defendants were his agents in the city and county of El Paso; that as agents it was the duty of said defendants to look after and attend to the business and property of plaintiff, consisting of what is known as the Satterthwaite addition to the city of El Paso, Texas, and to do any and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Adams v. SayreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Hendrix v. HunnTexas Supreme Court · 1876
- Robertson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839
- Casey v. CaseyIllinois Supreme Court · 1852
- Minot v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Edwards v. StrongTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- Harrison v. OrrTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Krenz v. StrohmeirCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Henyan v. TrevinoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Van Orden v. PittsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1918
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.