Dunnington v. State Compensation Insurance Fund
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray
¶1 Mikel Dunnington (Dunnington) appeals from the findings of fact, conclusions of law and judgment entered by the Workers’ Compensation Court (WCC) determining that the State Compensation Insurance Fund (State Fund) correctly calculated his disability benefits. We affirm.
¶2 The issue on appeal is whether the WCC erred in concluding that Dunnington was not concurrently employed at the time of his injury.
BACKGROUND
¶3 In the spring of 1994, Dunnington began working for Century Construction, Inc. (Century) as a traffic controller on Century’s highway construction projects. Century generally paid…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lovell v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1993
- In re R.L.S.Montana Supreme Court · 1999
- Gee v. Cartwheel RestaurantMontana Supreme Court · 1982
- Hale v. Royal LoggingMontana Supreme Court · 1999
- Walter v. Public Auction YardsMontana Supreme Court · 1979
3Cited by6 opinions
- Goble v. Montana State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2014
- R. Held v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2024
- Goble v. Montana State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2014
- Preston v. Transportation InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- Preston v. Transportation InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.