Legal Opinion

Dodge v. Bardsley

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 12, 1933PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThaxter, J.

This case is an action of debt heard by the presiding Justice, who found for the defendants. It is before us on exceptions.

*231The pleadings, exhibits, agreed statement of facts, and the findings and rulings of the presiding Justice are made a part of the bill of exceptions. The bill then states: “To all which rulings the plaintiff hereby excepts and prays that her exceptions may be allowed, she having been aggrieved by said rulings.” The specific objections of the defendants set forth with no further particularity.

Rev. Stat. 1930, Ch. 91, Sec. 24, provides that any party aggrieved by the rulings…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McKown v. PowersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1894
  2. Dennis v. Waterford Packing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1915
  3. Small v. WallaceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1925
  4. State v. CohenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1926

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bradford v. DavisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1947
  2. Gerrish v. ChambersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1937
  3. McDougal v. HuntSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950
  4. Sard v. SardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
  5. Mac Motor Sales, Inc. v. PateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API