Legal Opinion

People v. Pipkin

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 29, 1982No. 81SA421PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSON, Justice.

Pursuant to section 16-12-102, C.R.S. 1973 (now in 1978 Repl.Vol. 8), the district attorney has sought to have us interpret Crim.P. 48(b)(6)(V) and section 18-1-405(6)(e), C.R.S.1973 (now in 1978 Repl.Vol. 8), as granting the prosecution as much as three months to try an accused after a trial is concluded by the granting of a mistrial provided that the delay is reasonable and required by the circumstances occurring as a result of the mistrial. In our view, the interpretation urged by the district attorney may be proper under the circumstances of this case. Accordingly, we…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Carr v. District Court in & for Eighth Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  3. People v. ColantonioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  4. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  5. People v. SanchezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mason v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. People v. BellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. People v. RunningbearSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  4. People v. MartinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  5. People v. BeyetteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API