Legal Opinion

Ingram v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 14, 2003No. A03A0761PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

Vincent Ingram was charged with child molestation, aggravated child molestation, and rape of A. W. A jury found him guilty of child molestation and not guilty of the other charges. The court sentenced him to 20 years imprisonment. His motion for new trial was denied, and he appeals. Ingram contends that the state violated his right to due process by failing to preserve “potentially exculpatory evidence.” Further, he claims that the court erred in admitting hearsay at the trial, in charging the jury, in considering certain testimony at the presentencing hearing, and in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Gregg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  3. Higgins v. TrenthamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. Felder v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  5. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. Fiek v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. EZEBUIRO v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Evans v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API