Legal Opinion

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. United Video Cablevision of St. Louis, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1987No. 51692PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL R. GAERTNER, Judge.

This action was instituted by plaintiff, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, against defendant, United Video Cablevision of St. Louis, Inc., seeking to recover $266,383.91, the alleged cost of furnishing “locate and mark” services rendered in connection with the installation by United Video of underground cable. After a non-jury trial, the trial court made extensive findings of fact and conclusions of law and entered judgment for defendant. Bell appeals, we affirm.

Our review of a judge-tried case is narrowly prescribed. We must sustain the judgment of the trial court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. General Aggregate Corp. v. LaBrayereMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Goldberg v. Charlie's Chevrolet, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Haynes v. Missouri Property Insurance Placement FacilityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Rosenblum v. GibbonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State Ex Inf. Danforth v. Kansas City Firefighters Local No. 42Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Westerhold v. Mullenix Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Reid v. ReidMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Jones v. Estate of McReynoldsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Coldwell Bankers-Gordon Co. Realtors v. WatersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Union Pacific R. Co. v. Midland Equities Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API