Legal Opinion
Crow-New Jersey 32 Ltd. Partnership v. Township of Clinton
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 28, 1989No. Civ. A. 89-0234 (JCL)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LIFLAND, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are developers who own property in the Township of Clinton, New Jersey. They seek a judgment setting aside and declaring null and void a land use ordinance. Jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
Plaintiffs claim that the ordinance violates federal and state constitutional rights and that the ordinance is preempted by and inconsistent with legislation enacted by the State of New Jersey.
Presently before the court is a motion by plaintiffs for summary judgment. The Township of Clinton has moved to dismiss the complaint, arguing that the…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Smithfield Concerned Citizens for Fair Zoning v. The Town of Smithfield, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Rumson Estates, Inc. v. Mayor of Fair HavenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- Hon. Dana L. Redd v. Vance Bowman(073567)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
- Mt. Olive Complex v. TWP. OF MT. OLIVENew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.