Legal Opinion

Doe v. Roe

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 1, 2010No. 26779PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waller

In this family court case, we granted petitioner’s request for a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in Doe v. Roe, 379 S.C. 291, 665 S.E.2d 182 (Ct.App.2008). We reverse.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This case involves the biological child of petitioner Jane Roe (Mother) and respondent John Doe (Father). The child (Daughter) was born on March 6, 2005. In December 2005, when Daughter was nine months old, Father filed suit seeking paternity testing, and primary custody or visitation. *627Mother answered, admitted Father was the biological father, and sought termination of Father’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Joiner Ex Rel. Rivas v. RivasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Abernathy v. Baby BoySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERV. v. HeaddenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  4. Charleston County Department of Social Services v. KingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  5. South Carolina Department of Social Services v. SeegarsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. South Carolina Department of Social Services v. M.R.C.L.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. Adoptive Couple v. Baby GirlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  3. Doe v. RoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. Swain v. BollingerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2022
  5. Swain v. BollingerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API