Legal Opinion
William Schoffner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 26, 1987No. 85-3900, 85-3915PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiff appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing these two tax cases. These appeals have been referred to a panel of the Court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. After an examination of the record and the briefs, this panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
The plaintiff filed tax returns for 1980, 1981, and 1982 which listed his name and address and then listed either an asterisk or the word “none” in every other space on the forms. The forms also stated that these specific…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Charles J. Martin v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Ralph E. Heitman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- James Martin v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Dr. Marjorie E. Nelson v. United States of America, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
3Cited by17 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Cincinnati Bronze, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- State Industries, Inc. v. Mor-Flo Industries, Inc. And American Appliance Mfg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Joseph A. Lefebvre v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Marvin D. Miller v. United States of America and Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Arnold Cohn and Eleanor L. Cohn v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.