Legal Opinion
New York & Oriental S. S. Co. v. Automobile Ins. Co. of Hartford
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 20, 1930No. 175PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwan, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The plaintiff undertakes to maintain the .position that the one-year limitation for suit, contained in the policy, forms no part of the contract of insurance made between the parties. Counsel’s contentions are (1) that the certificate itself evidences a complete contract of insurance of the collectible freight against the peril of stranding and resulting jettison; and (2) that, if the certificate alone is not sufficient to disclose what risks are covered, then reference may be made to the policy, but only for the purpose of completing the terms of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- London Assurance v. Companhia De Moagens Do BarreiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Queen Insurance Co. of America v. Globe & Rutgers Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- The Turret CrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Sherri v. National Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Mellon v. Federal Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1926
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. of NJ v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Pure Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- General Ins. Co. of America v. LinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Refined Syrups & Sugars, Inc. v. Travelers InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Great American Ins. Co. Of New York v. MaxeyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.