Legal Opinion

Lorimer v. St. Paul City Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 8, 1892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by defendant, St. Paul City Eailway Company, from an order of the district court of Eamsey county, Egan, J., made June 26, 1891, refusing a new trial. 1 The plaintiff, Eobert B. Lorimer, was employed as conductor on defendant’s electric street cars, Grand avenue line, St. Paul. At the west end of the line the motor car is detached, and taken through the switches to the east end of the trailer, and again attached for the return trip.

Read the full summary

Appeal by defendant, St. Paul City Eailway Company, from an order of the district court of Eamsey county, Egan, J., made June 26, 1891, refusing a new trial. 1 The plaintiff, Eobert B. Lorimer, was employed as conductor on defendant’s electric street cars, Grand avenue line, St. Paul. At the west end of the line the motor car is detached, and taken through the switches to the east end of the trailer, and again attached for the return trip. In doing this, September 3, 1890, the motor car was uncoupled, and stood about two feet from the trailer. Plaintiff was upon the rear platform of the motor…

1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.

The plaintiff, while acting as a conductor on the defendant’s electric street railway, was injured by reason of his foot being caught between the irons by which the electric motor car is coupled to the coach in its rear. This occurred at the end of the road, where the cars are uncoupled and switched from one track to another. Negligence on the part of the man operating the motor car is assigned, in that he backed the car when he should have gone forward. But it was further alleged that the defendant was chargeable with negligence in providing cars with a defective motive power. The electric…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Melzner v. Raven Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Adduci v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  3. Dugan v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  4. National Fuel Co. v. MacciaColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Rapson Coal Mining Co. v. MicheliSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API