People v. Echols
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MARSHALL, J.
In this case a helicopter was the instrument used by the police to establish the speed of the defendant. The defendant appealed from his conviction for speeding and raised the defense that the helicopter and the procedure used by it constituted a speed trap.
Affirmance is dictated by In re Beamer (1955) 133 Cal.App.2d 63, 68 [283 P.2d 356]. In that decision, Mr. Justice Peters declared that the *Supp. 3only type of “speed trap” prohibited by section 751 of the Vehicle Code (now §§ 40801, 40802 and 40803) is one possessed of four characteristics:
“(1) A particular section of a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re BeamerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. HalopoffAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1976
- People v. DarbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979