Rose v. Douglass Township
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from, Butler District Court. ActioN by the Township of Douglass, Butler county against George H. Rose, as administrator of the estate of D. S. Rose, deceased, and others, on an official bond of a township treasurer. At the June term, 1890, plaintiff had judgment. Defendants come to this court. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
D. S. Rose and George W. Hogg, the sureties upon the official bond of C. A. McNabb, treasurer of Douglass township, in their answer admitted that the township was duly organized; that McNabb was duly elected treasurer of the township; that the bond sued on was filed in the office of the county clerk on the 17th day of November, 1887; that the board of county commissioners, on the 3d day of January, 1888, entered their approval upon the bond; that McNabb took the oath of office and entered upon the discharge of the duties thereof, and, as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. PrescottSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- McCormick v. Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Butler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Taylor County v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Manley v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
3Cited by23 opinions
- Wiley v. City of SpartaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- State v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Hanover Ins. Companies v. Brotherhood State BankDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1979
- Phillips v. Yates Center National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- State v. BruceIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.