Borden v. State
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
MAXWELL, J.,
for the Court:
¶ 1. Barron Borden seeks post-conviction relief (PCR) from his guilty plea to capital murder and Alford plea to third-degree arson. He argues his pleas were not voluntarily made and that he is “legally innocent.” After review, we find Borden has not shown any constitutional violations, so he is not “legally innocent” of either offense. We also find he was thoroughly advised of his constitutional rights, the nature of the charge against him, and the consequences of his pleas. Because each plea was knowingly and intelligently made and supported by a factual basis, we…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sawyer v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- McQuarter v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Anderson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kirby Shavers v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
- Kenneth Blake Watkins v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2014
- Quinton Carter v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
- Daniel Richard Zales v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015
- Adrian Hughes v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.