Legal Opinion

Quaker Transit Co. v. Jack W. Blumenfeld & Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1980No. 28PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

In this action of assumpsit to recover charges for moving, the complaint was served on July 17, 1978. Twenty-two days later, on August 8, 1978, the plaintiff took a default judgment for $3,951.21 because of defendant’s failure to enter an appearance or file an answer. The trial court refused to open the judgment, and defendant appealed. We reverse.

A petition to open judgment is a matter of judicial discretion. It is an appeal to the court’s equitable powers, and is to be exercised only when three factors coalesce: (1) the petition has been promptly filed; (2) a meritorious…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. BALK v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Kraynick v. HERTZSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Fox v. MellonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Silverman v. POLISSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. B.C.Y., Inc., Equipment Leasing Associates v. BukovichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Burkett v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Penneys v. Richard Kastner Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. DiNardo v. Central Penn Air Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Lalumera v. Nazareth HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Estate of Levy by Levy v. CNA Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API