Legal Opinion

Hoyt, Sheriff v. Pullman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 12, 1915No. 5493PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from County Court, Payne County; W. H. Wilcox, Judge. Action by George' Pullman against T. J. Hoyt, as Sheriff of Payne County. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

Defendant in error, George. Pullman, brought this suit in replevin as plaintiff in the court below against T. J. Hoyt, sheriff of Payne county, to recover certain articles of personal property taken by said sheriff under a writ of execution, upon the claim and theory that said articles were exempt to plaintiff as tools or apparatus used by him in the exercise of his trade as a butcher. At a trial of the case certain articles replevied, •and which will hereafter be mentioned in detail, -were allowed plaintiff as articles exempt to him under the law. To reverse this judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brummage v. KenworthySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Hammond v. McFarlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Smith v. RoadsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Field v. GoatSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. In Re SimsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1999
  3. In Re Allen's GuardianshipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. In Re SiegmannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  5. In Re McKaskleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API