Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Kaldor v. Court of Common Pleas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1984No. 83-674PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

As noted in State, ex rel. Pressley, v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St. 2d 141 [40 O.O.2d 141], mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, and the third paragraph of the syllabus therein states in part that when “* * * it is determined that the relator has a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law by way of appeal, neither the Supreme Court nor the Court of Appeals has authority to exercise jurisdictional discretion but those courts are required to deny the writ.” The exhaustion of the plain *115and adequate remedies in the ordinary course of the law is a prerequisite to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. MapsonOhio Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Jackson v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. LewisOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. State ex rel. Jackson v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. HendersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API