Thomas v. State

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

This appeal is from a conviction for the offense of robbery; the punishment was assessed by a jury at 99 years.

Appellant initially contends that his request for discovery of the “criminal records in possession of the prosecutor regarding the State’s witnesses,” should have been granted.

There is no showing that the prosecuting attorney had any “criminal records” regarding the State’s witnesses in his possession. No error is shown by the refusal of such request. Elliott v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 475 S.W.2d 239; Hardin v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 453 S.W.2d 156.

Next, appellant asserts…