Legal Opinion

Hinckel v. Steigers

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1948No. 30375PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

As a result of his collision, in the city of Seattle, March 12, 1946, with an automobile owned by de fendant marital community and operated by defendant husband, Theodore J. Hinckel, a minor, sustained personal injuries. An action was instituted by the boy’s father, as guardian ad litem, to recover against defendants for the personal injuries sustained by his minor son and to recover for certain expenses of hospitalization and services of physicians incurred by the father. Trial of the cause to a jury resulted in verdict in favor of plaintiffs. From the judgment entered, motions for judgment…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McQuillan v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Steele v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Eckhardt v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. Wickman v. LundyWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Askey v. New York Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Graving v. DornWashington Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API