Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. MPB Corporation

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided October 25, 2019No. N18C-03-156 CEBPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DAVID L. HAMILTON and JUDY HAMILTON, Plaintiffs, Vv. C.A. No. N18C-03-156 CEB MPB CORPORATION d/b/a TIMKEN SUPER PRECISION, a Delaware Corporation, ET AL., Nee ee Ne Ne ee ae ee ee ee Se Se Se Defendants. Submitted: July 24, 2019 Decided: October 25, 2019 MEMORANDUM OPINION Upon consideration of MPB Corporation d/b/a TIMKEN ’’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint DENIED Jason D. Warren, Esquire, SHELSBY & LEONI, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware. Keith L. Maynard, Esquire, Spohrer & Dodd, P.L., Jacksonville, Florida. Attorneys for Plaintiffs.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Touhy v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v. ArteagaSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  3. Pack v. Beech Aircraft CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1957
  4. Oliver v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  5. Templeton v. KyKenKee, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API