Legal Opinion
Rajput v. Synchrony Bank
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 31, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:15-CV-1595PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
William J. Nealon, United States District Judge
On August 14, 2015, Plaintiff, Rachel Rajput, filed a complaint against Defendant, Synchrony Bank f/k/a GE Capital Retail Bank, under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq. (“TCPA”). (Doc. 1). Plaintiff alleges that “[beginning in or around August 2014 and continuing through October 2014 Defendant called Plaintiff on her cellular telephone on a repetitive and continuous basis in an attempt to contact her about a Gap, Inc. credit card.” (Id at p. 3). She claims that “[w]hen contacting Plaintiff on her cellular…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- In Re KOREAN AIR LINES DISASTER OF SEPTEMBER 1, 1983. Appeal of Plaintiffs Steering CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Holloway v. City of Virginia Beach, VirginiaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2021
- IOWA NETWORK SERVICES, INC. v. AT&T CORP.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- Palladino v. Client Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- United States v. The Cincinnati Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2021