Legal Opinion

O'Brien v. Brown

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 7, 1990No. 87-528PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant challenges the trial court’s dismissal of his habeas corpus petition. We affirm.

Appellant’s petition is moot. Generally, when no live controversy exists, *653or when the parties no longer have a legally cognizable interest in the outcome, a case is moot. In re A.K., 153 Vt. 462, 465, 571 A.2d 75, 77 (1990); In re S.H., 141 Vt. 278, 280, 448 A.2d 148, 149 (1982). Appellant’s conviction of the underlying offense extinguished his legal interest in the habeas corpus petition. The case does not fall within the “capable of repetition” or “collateral consequences” exceptions to the mootness…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BeginsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  2. In re S. H.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  3. In Re Green Mountain Power Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  4. In re A.K.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chase v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  2. Wood AppealsVermont Superior Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API