Legal Opinion

Mohr v. Sonnet

United States District Court

Decided August 14, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Melko, D. C. J.

The plaintiff brought this action in the District Court of the Second Judicial District of the county of Essex, seeking to recover damages allegedly caused by the defendant’s automobile negligently striking and destroying lands, buildings, and shrubbery of the plaintiff located in Middlesex county.

Defendant’s objection that this was a local action and under the provision of R. S. 1937, 2:27-18, should be tried in the county in which the real estate in question is situated or the cause of action arose, was sustained and an order made accordingly transferring the action to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Karr v. New York Jewell Filtration Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  2. Wall Rope Works, Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  3. MacPhail v. NassauUnited States District Court · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Beca Realty v. EisbergNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API