Vigil v. Badger Mutual Insurance

Defendant Badger Mutual Insurance Company brings this appeal from a $1,740 judgment entered against it after jury verdict on a fire and extended coverage insurance policy issued to plaintiff.

The defense below, repeated on appeal, was that the policy of insurance did not cover plaintiff’s loss. The trial judge ruled as a matter of law, and so instructed the jury, that it did. We agree.

Defendant’s policy insured plaintiff against loss on the following 6 items and for the amounts specified:

“1. $4,000 on the frame, composition roof, 1-family dwelling. * * *

“2. $2,500 on-the contents in the above…