City of Portsmouth v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Case 17845, City of Portsmouth v. Public Utilities Commission, and Case 17846, City of Portsmouth v. Public Utilities Commission, relate to the same ordinance, and the questions to be determined arise out of the conclusions of the Public Utilities Commission concerning that ordinance.
No. 17846 may be denominated the Sciotoville case, and arises from the following facts:
The United Fuel Gas Company, for some time prior to 1920, had been supplying natural gas to residents in a certain unincorporated territory contiguous to the city of Portsmouth. This territory was afterward…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- San Diego Land & Town Co. v. National CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.