Legal Opinion

Wakefield Nursery v. Hunter

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 11, 1984No. 83-918PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERSEY, Judge.

In this appeal from a summary final judgment we reverse because only eight days transpired between the date of the Notice and the date of the hearing whereas the rules clearly require twenty days notice. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510(c). See Greer v. Workman, 203 So.2d 665 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967). In any event ownership of the pipes and an agreement as to their continued use were genuine material issues of fact the existence of which would have precluded summary judgment even after adequate notice. See, e.g., Tompkins v. Rosenberg, 194 So.2d 688 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967) the court there noting that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Greer v. WorkmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  2. Tompkins v. RosenbergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Titusville Associates, Ltd. v. Barnett Banks Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Barnett Banks Trust Co., NA v. Titusville Assocs., Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Barnett Banks Trust Co. v. Titusville Associates, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API