Legal Opinion · Dissent

MBC, INC. v. Space Center Minnesota, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 4, 1988No. 86-0338Published

1DissentJustice McNAMARA

I agree with the majority that the trial court correctly concluded that defendant waived the condition precedent by closing on the contract. However, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to reduce the damages awarded to plaintiff based on its finding that plaintiff’s efforts to relet the premises were unreasonable.

In 1984, Illinois enacted a statute requiring a landlord or his agent to take reasonable measures to mitigate the damages recoverable against a defaulting lessee. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 110, par. 9—213.1.) Prior to that time, however, including the period…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schatz v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1972
  2. ABC Trans National Transport, Inc. v. Aeronautics Forwarders, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. VEE SEE CONSTRUCTION CO. v. LuckettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Hedges Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Harmon v. CallahanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API