Legal Opinion
Hutchins v. Cardiac Science, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 1, 2007No. C.A. 04-30126-MAPPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
PONSOR, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In this action, pro se Plaintiff Donald C. Hutchins alleges that Defendant Cardiac Science, Inc. (“Cardiac Science”) is liable for copyright infringement (Count One), patent infringement by means of sales (Count Two), patent infringement by means of manufacture (Count Three), abuse of process (Count Six), and tortious interference with contract (Count Seven). 1
Cardiac Science denies Plaintiffs allegations and has moved for summary judgment on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Intel Corporation v. Via Technologies, Inc., a California Corporation, via Technologies, Inc., a Taiwan Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Draghetti v. ChmielewskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Johnson v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Gutierrez v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Hutchins v. Cardiac Science, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.