Legal Opinion

Hilsendegen v. Scheich

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1885PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Jennison, J.) Proceedings for possession of land. Defendant brings-error.

1Opinion of the Court

Champlin. J.

The plaintiff in this case seeks to recover possession of certain premises leased to defendant, under How. Stat. § 8295, subd. 1, which reads as follows:

“ The person entitled to any premises may recover possession thereof in the manner hereinafter provided, in the following cases: First. When any person shall hold over any lands or tenements, after the time for which they are demised •or let to him, or to the person under whom he holds, or contrary to the conditions or covenants of any executory contract for the purchase of lands or tenements, or any lease or agreement under which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Allen v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Carteri v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. Diffie H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. Carpenter H. F. Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. McInnisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  3. Hanaw v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. In re PennewellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
  5. Finch v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API