Legal Opinion

Snell v. Stone

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Josephine County: Lionel R. Webster, Judge. Plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

This is an action by Snell, Heitshu & Woodward of Portland against John J. Stone and C. M. Stone, husband and wife, on account for goods, wares, and merchandise sold to them by plaintiffs, and by the BlumauerFrank Drug Company, and J. K. Gill & Company, who have assigned their accounts to plaintiff. The defendant C. M. Stone made default, but the defendant John J. Stone answered, denying the allegations of the complaint. A trial resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of defendants, from which plaintiffs appeal, assigning error in the giving of certain instructions by the trial court.

On…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Diversy v. KelloggIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Hatch v. CoddingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Benjamin v. CovertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Wardwell v. HaightNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  5. Murphy v. OttenheimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Haggett v. HurleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1898
  2. Hoaglin v. C. M. Henderson &. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API