Legal Opinion
McCormick v. City of Lawrence
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided September 30, 2003No. CIV.A.03-2195-GTVPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VanBEBBER, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs Dale E. McCormick and Curtis A. Kastl II, proceeding pro se, bring this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants, Lawrence, Kansas police officers, the City of Lawrence, and an assistant district attorney, violated their First, Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights during and after Plaintiffs’ arrests in July of 2002 and at various other times. The City of Lawrence and its police officers moved to dismiss Plaintiffs’ case, and the court denied the motion in part and granted it…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Gff Corporation, an Oklahoma Corporation v. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc., a Missouri CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Walter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Binion v. City of St. PaulDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2011