Legal Opinion

Moore v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1925No. 24764PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

This is an appeal from a conviction for having intoxicating liquor in possession. The conviction rests on testimony obtained by a search of the appellant’s automobile without a warrant therefor. The bill of exceptions sets forth this testimony and the appellant’s objection thereto as follows:

“Said Simmons, being duly sworn, testified as follows: That on the 24th day of April, 1924, he was called over the telephone by an officer of an adjoining county, who stated to him that an automobile containing whisky was making a rapid approach to the city of Jackson, and would pass into the city of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. People v. . ChiaglesNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Haywood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1920
  4. Tucker v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Lambert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Sanders v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Rooks v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. LeeOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Stringer v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  5. McNutt v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1926

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API