Legal Opinion
Austin v. Nestle USA, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided December 28, 2009No. Civ. 09-2675 (RHK/JSM)PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This action arises out of the ingestion of powdered infant formula by Plaintiff Brandy Austin’s daughter, Christa, shortly af ter her birth. 1 On behalf of herself and Christa, she sued Defendant Nestle USA, Inc. (“Nestle”), the formula’s manufacturer, alleging that Christa suffered severe brain damage because the formula was contaminated with Enterobacter sakazakii bacteria. Nestle now moves to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. For the reasons set forth below,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Omi Holdings, Inc. v. Royal Insurance Company Of CanadaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Terra International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Mississippi Chemical Corporation, a Mississippi CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Ford Motor Co. v. Ryan. Ferguson v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Klatte v. Buckman, Buckman & Reid, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Cosmetic Warriors Ltd. v. AbrahamsonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
- Valspar Corp. v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Valspar Corp. v. Kronos Worldwide, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- My Pillow, Inc. v. LMP Worldwide, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2018
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.