Legal Opinion

Gertz v. Fontecchio

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1951No. Docket 68, Calendar 45,173PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

Plaintiff and Herman Fontecchio, hereinafter called defendant, entered into a partnership agreement for the operation of an automobile repair and paint shop for an indefinite period of time. Plaintiff had money but no experience in such business. Defendant, a mechanic, had the necessary experience but no money. Accordingly, plaintiff pur chased a going business of that character for $6,000. Under the partnership agreement his $6,000 investment was to be returned to him out of first profits, after which the partners were to share profits equally. Conformable with plaintiff’s insistence that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stratmann v. StratmannMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Block v. SchmidtMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Vanderplow v. FredricksMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Steckroth v. FergusonMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Band v. Livonia AssociatesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Matter of Estate of AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  3. In Re Estate of BolingerMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Bernstein, Bernstein, Wile & Gordon v. RossMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Gorger v. GorgerOregon Supreme Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API