Gertz v. Fontecchio
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.
Plaintiff and Herman Fontecchio, hereinafter called defendant, entered into a partnership agreement for the operation of an automobile repair and paint shop for an indefinite period of time. Plaintiff had money but no experience in such business. Defendant, a mechanic, had the necessary experience but no money. Accordingly, plaintiff pur chased a going business of that character for $6,000. Under the partnership agreement his $6,000 investment was to be returned to him out of first profits, after which the partners were to share profits equally. Conformable with plaintiff’s insistence that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stratmann v. StratmannMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Block v. SchmidtMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Vanderplow v. FredricksMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Steckroth v. FergusonMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
3Cited by10 opinions
- Band v. Livonia AssociatesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Matter of Estate of AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- In Re Estate of BolingerMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- Bernstein, Bernstein, Wile & Gordon v. RossMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Gorger v. GorgerOregon Supreme Court · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.