Legal Opinion

State v. Finnell

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 2018No. C–160815PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Zayas, Judge.

{¶ 1} Kyle Finnell appeals the judgment of the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas denying his motion to disclose juror information under seal and denying his motion for a new trial. In his second assignment of error, Finnell argues that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to articulate to the court that he was entitled to the juror information under Evid.R. 606(B) because the jurors were allowed to testify regarding any threats or attempted threats. We agree, and we reverse the trial court's judgment denying the motion to disclose juror information and remand the cause…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. State v. FinnellOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WardOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. Dangerfield v. Warden, Southeastern Correctional ComplexDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
  3. Finnell v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
  4. Finnell v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
  5. Finnell v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API