Marshall v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Phipps, Judge.
David Carl Marshall was convicted by a Richmond County jury of burglary and armed robbery. Marshall enumerates as error the trial court’s denial of his motion for a directed verdict, charges to the jury on reasonable doubt and reasonable doubt as to identity, and denial of his motion for a new trial. He also claims that counsel was *851ineffective and that the evidence was insufficient to authorize the verdict. We find no merit in these enumerations of error, and we affirm.
Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, Gracie Watson and Lucille Levert, two…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mallory v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- Perkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
- Boscaino v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Redding v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
- Sullivan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Worsham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Redding v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015