Legal Opinion

Marshall v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 8, 1999No. A99A0969PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

David Carl Marshall was convicted by a Richmond County jury of burglary and armed robbery. Marshall enumerates as error the trial court’s denial of his motion for a directed verdict, charges to the jury on reasonable doubt and reasonable doubt as to identity, and denial of his motion for a new trial. He also claims that counsel was *851ineffective and that the evidence was insufficient to authorize the verdict. We find no merit in these enumerations of error, and we affirm.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, Gracie Watson and Lucille Levert, two…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Mallory v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  4. Perkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  5. Boscaino v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Redding v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  2. Sullivan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. Worsham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  4. Redding v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API