Legal Opinion

Hommerding v. Clarence Landwehr Heavy Moving

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 7, 1966No. 39686PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

Certiorari to review a decision of the Industrial Commission denying benefits for an alleged work-connected back injury.

Relator, Virgil Hommerding, employed as an “oiler,” was a part of a crew of seven men engaged in tearing down a large, metal, propane-gas storage tank — removing and cutting up the metal sheeting of which it was constructed with acetylene torches. The employee testified that on March 27, 1962, while carrying a 125-pound oxygen tank to the cutting crew and when he was within 15 or 20 feet of his coworkers, he slipped upon one of the oily metal sheets. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jurich v. Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Fisher v. RED & WHITE TAXI COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. Anderson v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dudovitz v. Shoppers City, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Oster v. RileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. Knaeble v. Custom Tool & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. Caouette v. Leef Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  5. Dudovitz v. Shoppers City, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API