Legal Opinion

Sanato v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 11, 2016No. 15-cv-7486PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*874ORDER

Judge Amy J. St. Eve

Defendant Sears, Roebuck and Company (“Sears”) has moved the Court to compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. § 1, et seq. (R.6). For the following reasons, the Court denies Defendant’s motion [6],

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff James Sanato filed this action against Sears in August 2015, alleging unlawful termination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (R.1, Compl.). He alleges that he worked at Sears from January 2005 until December 2012, when Sears terminated his employment for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anthony Hill v. Daniel M. TangherliniCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  2. Ilah M. Tinder v. Pinkerton SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  3. Christopher L. Gore v. Alltel CommuCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  4. Marr v. Bank of America, NACourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  5. Avery J. Stone, as Trustee of the Anita M. Stone Family Trust and the Avery J. Stone Trust v. David J. DoergeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anand v. HeathDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  2. Hoganberry v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API