Sanato v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
*874ORDER
Judge Amy J. St. Eve
Defendant Sears, Roebuck and Company (“Sears”) has moved the Court to compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. § 1, et seq. (R.6). For the following reasons, the Court denies Defendant’s motion [6],
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff James Sanato filed this action against Sears in August 2015, alleging unlawful termination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (R.1, Compl.). He alleges that he worked at Sears from January 2005 until December 2012, when Sears terminated his employment for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anthony Hill v. Daniel M. TangherliniCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Ilah M. Tinder v. Pinkerton SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Christopher L. Gore v. Alltel CommuCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Marr v. Bank of America, NACourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Avery J. Stone, as Trustee of the Anita M. Stone Family Trust and the Avery J. Stone Trust v. David J. DoergeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Anand v. HeathDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- Hoganberry v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023