Legal Opinion

Staley v. Kreinbihl

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1949No. 31653 and 31660PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

The decision of case No. 31653 rests upon whether the specific property of the trust in this case must be or was identified and traced in the evidence. In other words, may the plaintiff below, unanimously found to be a beneficiary, recover as cestui que trust or must she recover, if at all, as a creditor?

While two judges of the Court of Appeals held in substance that she was a suppliant in a court of equity, the third judge, recognizing an original trust, held that plaintiff below must recover, if at all, as a creditor.

The Court of Appeals was unanimous in holding that the amended petition…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Massey v. FisherU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1894
  2. Cook v. CriderOhio Court of Appeals · 1939

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Butt v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. Dixon v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Lewis v. SteinreichOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Bishop v. BishopOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. State ex rel. Insurance Commissioner of West Virginia v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of West Virginia, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API