Legal Opinion
Isidor Weinstein Investment Co. v. Hearst Corporation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 29, 1969No. Civ. 51069PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
GEORGE B. HARRIS, Chief Judge.
The first amended complaint sets out two causes of action. The first is on behalf of Isidor Weinstein Investment Co., the successor in interest of Weinstein Co., Inc. which appears to have been dissolved in 1968.
Weinstein owned six retail stores in San Francisco, and one each in Hayward and Sunnyvale; also, eight liquor, drug and sundries departments in discount stores located in Northern California.
Defendants’ asserted antitrust violations embraced in the complaint are said to have forced cessation…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Karseal Corporation v. Richfield Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Conference of Studio Unions v. Loew's Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. GoldwynCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re National Mortgage Equity Corp. Mortgage Pool Certificates Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1986
- Porter v. Household Finance Corp. of ColumbusDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1974
- Health Care Equalization Committee v. Iowa Medical SocietyDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1980
- Vandervelde v. Put and Call Brokers and Dealers Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Kirihara v. Bendix CorporationDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.