Legal Opinion

People v. Russell

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 1963No. Crim. 9072PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Defendant was found guilty of a violation of section 337a, subdivision 2, Penal Code (occupying a house with books, papers, apparatus and paraphernalia for the purpose of recording and registering horseracing bets). He appeals from the judgment of conviction.

Acting on information from a sergeant in administrative vice that by dialing a certain telephone number bets could be placed on numbers and horses, Officer Hubbard determined from the telephone company that the number was registered to a woman at 11616 South San Pedro. On June 1, 1962, around 1 p.m., while his partner, Officer Nishimura,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. MaddoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. FischerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. People v. HammondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. De SantiagoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. BarthelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. People v. ArellanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. People v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Rodney Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API