Legal Opinion

Bollinger v. Interurban Street Railway Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 15, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York entered in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial before the court and a jury, and also from an order "denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.

This is a husband’s action for the recovery of damages suffered by him in consequence of an accident to his wife. The claim is that after the wife, who was carrying a child in her arms, had safely boarded the car — a closed one — and was entering the car from the rear platform, the car was started with such a violent jerk that she was thrown forward on to her knees, and that then the car was stopped with a jerk so violent that she was thrown backward on to *294her back. The only evidence as to the accident was given by the injured wife and her sister, the defendant proving that it had received no…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dochtermann v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. Black v. Third Avenue RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Atwood v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. De Yoe v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Goold v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadCity of New York Municipal Court · 1908
  4. Chicago Union Traction Co. v. DucksteinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907
  5. Midland Valley R. v. PageDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API