Legal Opinion

LeBlanc v. Board of Appeals of Danvers

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 7, 1992No. 91-P-370PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.

Although the plaintiff’s lot, as shown on a recorded plan, fronts on a way, the portion of the way serving the lot is as yet unconstructed. This is an appeal from the entry of summary judgment for the plaintiff declaring that his lot has the requisite frontage to be protected for zoning purposes under the first sentence of the fourth paragraph of G. L. c. 40A, § 6, as appearing in St. 1975, c. 808, § 3. 2 The judgment reversed the decision of the board of appeals (board) which upheld the denial of a' building permit by the building inspector on the ground that the lot did not meet the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Adamowicz v. Town of IpswichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Sturges v. Town of ChilmarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. Murphy v. Mart Realty of Brockton, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  4. Gifford v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. Guillet v. LivernoisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marinelli v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  2. Silva v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  3. Berg v. Town of LexingtonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API