Legal Opinion

Criswell v. Boudreaux

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 24, 2021No. 1:20-cv-01048Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES CRISWELL, et al., No. 1:20-cv-01048-DAD-SAB 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADING 14 MICHAEL BOUDREAUX, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Tulare County, (Doc. No. 59) 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 This matter is before the court on plaintiffs’ unopposed motion for leave to file a 19 supplemental pleading pursuant to Rule 15(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. No. 20 59.) Pursuant to General Order No. 617 addressing the public health…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Keith v. VolpeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Ferris v. Farnsworth Television & Radio Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API