Legal Opinion

People v. Armstrong

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 2001No. Docket 230304PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals by delayed leave granted from an eight-to-fifteen-year sentence imposed for a conviction of second-degree criminal sexual conduct (esc). MCL 750.520c. We affirm but remand for completion of a guidelines departure form. This appeal is being decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E)(1)(b).

Defendant’s sole claim on appeal is that his minimum sentence, which represents a fourfold increase of the highest minimum sentence under the guidelines, violated the principle of proportionality under People v Milbourn, 435 Mich 630, 636; 461 NW2d 1 (1990). We review for an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. MilbournMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. FlemingMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  3. People v. FieldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. BabcockMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. People v. NelsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. HornMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. People v. SolmonsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. People v. SolmonsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. People v. GenoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. People v. GenoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API