Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Kendrick Weatherspoon

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 13, 2005No. 03-10551Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

TROTT, Circuit Judge;

Concurring in part and Dissenting in part:

I

Prosecutorial misconduct in the context of closing argument is entirely a creation of our “common law.” In examining these issues, we do not begin either with the plain language of any statute, or with a specific provision of the Constitution or the Bill of Rights. Instead, our warrant arises from the defendant’s broad right to a “fair trial” guaranteed by the Due Process Clause. As one might surmise, however, “[t]he line separating acceptable from improper advocacy is not easily drawn; there is often a gray'zone.” United States…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API